Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 10 Dec 96 18:00:30 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The following message was posted by anon,
Has anybody experienced any major problems with replacing electroless
plate with a direct plate system ? Currently we are evaluating the carbon
and graphite systems
We at Artetch replaced our Electroless some 2 years ago, initially with
the Atotech Neopact Palladium based system in a vertical process mode
using the existing Electroless plating plant. Neopact is an excellent
product and allowed the reduction of hazardous chemistry whilst giving a
reduction of 1 hour in our process cycle against electroless copper. We
also had the safe guard of understanding palladium chemistry and the
knowledge we could switch back to electroless within a few hours if
necessary.
Having tasted some of the benefits of direct plate we then wanted to move
to horizontal processing to gain more benefits and finally opted to go
with a carbon system, the main factors after the process were the
equipment cost and footprint.
I agree with Paul Gould you must evaluate all the options with care, in
our evaluations we found that to avoid wedge voids caused by erosion of
oxide at the inner junction you must use a reduced oxide despite all of
the restrictions this will impose on your processing, this was true for
every system we evaluated. If you do not process multilayer then no
problem
Our experience with both systems has been good, initially we had problems
striking thru the hole at pattern plate this was caused by a delay in
ramp up of the copper plate rectifiers removing the delay solved the
problem of 'dog boning' or strike thru, the incidence of voids is no
worse than with electroless copper, you must be prepared to run as good a
control system as you did with copper but you will find maintenance is
significantly reduced, be warned you cannot skimp the maintenance and
expect to achieve consistently good results I believe many have tried and
then blamed the process as being unreliable.
We process upto 14 layers on FR4, upto 8 layers on Polyimide with aspect
ratio's of upto 8:1 and Blind via's using blind drilling and sequential
building, our carbon system ( Macdermid Blackhole single pass ) copes
with this. We also process using reverse current pulse plating rectifiers
at pattern plate, direct plate works ok with this technology as well.
Good luck in your evaluations.
Clive Bell
Artetch Circuits Limited
Littlehampton. UK
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|