TECHNET Archives

February 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 10 Feb 1997 09:05:18 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 10 16:
33:49 1997
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ybtBM1.0.ZaB.zMp_o"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/10105
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vtx42-0000XPC; Mon, 10 Feb 97 08:50 CST
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16)
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Nearly a week ago I asked the TechNet members if anybody had any info
concerning the reliability of surface mount solder joints when soldermask
had partially covered the pad. No one has responded.. Has there been a study
done or does anybody have experience with failed solder joints that could be
directly attributed to soldermask encroachment?

Thanx for help in advance.....

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2