TECHNET Archives

December 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Vivari, John" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 09:03:21 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (872 bytes) , text/html (1669 bytes)
Dan,

Assuming your aspect ratio is right, a good -325 mesh solder paste is
capable and consistent to 0.4mm apertures so a smaller mesh should not be
necessary.  The benefit vs cost comparison is poor.  Below 0.4mm a -400 or
-500 mesh (depending upon aperture size) gives a marked improvement in
depoist consistency due to the ball size to aperture size ratio.  If your
paste has trouble with 0.5mm apertures in general, then a -400 is probably
in order for the 0201 process.

John Vivari
Technical Service Engineer
EFD Inc.
www.efd-inc.com
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Ph: 401-333-3800 x2204
Fx: 401-333-4954


Date:    Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:49:39 -0800
From:    "Dan R. Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: mesh size

I am currently using a -325 mesh solder paste, we just started using 0201
components. Will a finer mesh solder give me more uniform solder application
with the smaller apertures?
Dan


ATOM RSS1 RSS2