 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wUEHL-000BjAC; Wed, 21 May 97 11:30 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<buetmi> |
| Date: |
Wed, 21 May 1997 11:30:14 -0500 (CDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 21 12: |
34:44 1997 |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"hHRBm3.0.Np6.QCoWp"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Loop: |
|
| >From bergdi Wed May 21 11: |
30:48 1997 |
| Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9705211117.C81120-0100000@ipc> |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
TechNet,
Has anyone conducted--of know of--a study on the reliability of SMELF
(square end-cap cylindrical components)?
Also, how have assemblers treated SMELFs with regard to J-STD-001B? Are
they treated as square end components (per 9.2.6.4), or as MELFs (9.2.6.5)?
Thanks,
Mike Buetow
IPC Technical Staff
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook, IL 60062
P: 847-509-9700, ext. 335
F: 847-509-9798
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
