Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:35:22 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Richard,
I've used several Fischer XRF units over the past 30 years and was extremely
happy with their performance and with the service provided by Fischer.
George Wenger
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 2:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] XrF systems
I am considering requesting capital for an additional or replacement XrF
system, but would like to go in armed with a short list of particular models
and costs and be confident of their performance records and capabilities.
The least important factor is cost, so don't hold back from sending me a
confidential email on your choice.
The machine should be able to accurately determine the percentage of gold,
silver, tin, nickel, lead, copper, etc., down to the .001% level in order to
confirm that the plating on incoming component leads meets the component
print or requirements.
It should also be able to accurately determine the metallurgic make-up of
any given metal sample. Is that asking a lot? I don't know.
I prefer a hand-held, but if what I am looking for is only available in a
base machine package, then that will have to work.
No information you folks provide will be shared. Feel free to send me an
email at either [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> or
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>.
I sincerely appreciate any information you can share with me.
Thanks
R. Dean Stadem
|
|
|