 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uTDpQ-0000CiC; Mon, 10 Jun 96 15:44 CDT |
| Encoding: |
15 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 10 Jun 96 15:53:00 PDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"HHBOP.0.uGH._a8ln"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 11 09: |
20:41 1996 |
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------
From: JIM ENNIS
To: TechNet-request
Subject: Marking of 0603's
Date: Monday, June 10, 1996 3:06PM
A current discussion is whether we need to mark 0603's. It is *possible*,
but at extra cost and it's not really practical from a mfg standardpoint:
You can't read them without magnification. Does Bellcore require this?
Jim Ennis
Adtran
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
