Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Apr 2006 12:47:36 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
LSI |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My opinions
1) I agree with your assessment that J-STD-001 does not reference
IPC-7711/7721, in the Rework and Repair section or in the Applicable
Documents, so "no", I do not think you have misinterpreted.
2) Rework procedures are the responsibility of the manufacturer. As long as
they are documented, and the workmanship meets all J-STD-001 requirements,
you are covered. Repair procedures must be agreed upon by the manufacturer
and the user. Again, they must be documented. The IPC 7711/7721 are useful
to reference for these procedures. If you would like them to apply as a
REQUIREMENT, then listing on the drawing is not a bad idea.
3) As long as the assy meets all workmanship requirements of J-STD-001, and
the procedures are documented (IPC-77## or otherwise) then you will not be
in violation of J-STD-001 compliance.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of prasad godavarti
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:38 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] relationship between J-STD-001 and IPC 7711/7721: need your
help.
In a nutshell here is where i need some help:
we call out and enforce J-STD-001, Class 3 on our assembly drawings. Very
often we do repair/rework on these assemblies and we do not seem to have a
clear link between IPC 7711 and IPC 7721 wherein the how-to's and what to
control are listed and J-STD-001, Class3. The only words that address
repair/rework in
J-STD-001 have to do with the acceptance criteria for such operations.
Ques:
1. I am reading this correctly?
2. How do i ensure that the repair and rework procedures and the skill sets
are adequate? do I need to explicitly state in on the drawing the need for
repair and rework per IPC 771 and IPC 7721?
3. If i do not state that then is the compliance to
J-std-001 violated?
Thanks
Prasad Godavarti
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e To
unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the
BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet To temporarily halt or
(re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet
NOMAIL or (MAIL) To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send
e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest Search the archives of
previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please visit IPC web
site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|