Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uEVl9-00007lC; Wed, 1 May 96 01:51 CDT |
Encoding: |
23 Text |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 96 11:18:07 CST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"gyro73.0.QrK.sdmXn"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 16: |
33:35 1996 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Gary,
Are you looking for PWB fabrication process points or PWA assembly?
Looking at PWA assembly criteria, One thing you need to keep in mind
is that, more copper means more heath sinking at soldering so you need
to pay attention to the connections and implement proper thermal
relief patterns.
[log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: copper thickness
Author: [log in to unmask] at Dell_UNIX
Date: 4/30/96 05:50 AM
Would like input on the subject of 1 oz. vs. 2 oz copper thickness on inner
layers. What types of end products would be affected if 1 oz. were
substituted for 2 oz? What design considerations are most critical? Is it
safe to say that 1 oz. vs. 2 oz. should no longer be an issue?
Thank you for input.
Gary Longman
Electropac
|
|
|