 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uvk12-0000QGC; Wed, 28 Aug 96 07:46 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 28 Aug 1996 07:51:19 -0600 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Aug 28 09: |
14:01 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"ba-lH3.0.xHC.l-39o"@ipc> |
| Content-type: |
text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII |
| Subject: |
|
| Message-id: |
|
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
| Content-disposition: |
inline |
| X-Mailer: |
Novell GroupWise 4.1 |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I can't speak about the fabrication issues surrounding matte vs. glossy
soldermask but I know matte finish soldermask will reduce the formation
of solderballs during wave soldering. We have been doing work in this
area and have data.
Vic Beldavs
414-362-2797
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
