TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0v0nZZ-0000PMC; Wed, 11 Sep 96 06:35 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 11 Sep 96 07:42:12 EDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/6156
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"sLgjY2.0.Z47.mFgDo"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Sep 13 09:
50:26 1996
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
<9609111142.AA12681@e5sba46>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Dave,

The assembly is entirely thru-hole components.  The system uses VME format
boards and it is a case of having more board area then needed to achieve the
functionality required (what a concept).  Due to the nature of the RF 
circuits, the components are grouped close together leaving relatively 
large areas unpopulated.  Of course the lack of holes in areas without 
components makes a great place to lay down circuit traces on internal layers.

Jeff

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2