TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sEPPO-0000GnC; Wed, 24 May 95 18:00 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!uunet.uu.net!tijc02!SMROUTER!DRD%JOCY1%SIAMAIL%MSROUTER>
Date:
Wed, 24 May 95 18:22:00 PST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/542
From [log in to unmask] Fri Apr 26 13:
50:28 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"aZplB3.0.78A.ufxml"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
<9505250123.17791.AA@SMROUTER>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)

TO:[log in to unmask]

We are looking into the possibility of implementing in-line x-ray inspection 
of solder joints on our SMT assembly lines. I would like to speak with 
someone with actual experience in that area to discuss 
advantages/disadvantages, pros/cons. In general, experience with any type of 
automated solder joint inspection process would be of interest.

Dale Daugherty
Manufacturing Engineer
Siemens Industrial Automation, Inc.
(615) 461-2228
[log in to unmask]
(tijc02 is spelled with zero, not oh)



ATOM RSS1 RSS2