TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
X400-Content-Type:
P2-1988 ( 22 )
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="PART.BOUNDARY.corona.23bb.30ad0d9e.0001"
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!cdev.com!CLARK.F.WEBSTER>
Date:
17 Nov 1995 16:32:52 -0600
X-Status:
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Conversion:
Allowed
Disclose-Recipients:
Prohibited
Resent-Sender:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
Priority:
normal
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
18:11 1996
X-Loop:
Content-Return:
Allowed
X400-MTS-Identifier:
[/c=us/admd=/prmd=ceridian/; 023B930AD0D94001-MTAcorona]
TO:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> (Return requested)
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/201
Original-Encoded-Information-Types:
IA5-Text
Message-Id:
<"023B930AD0D94001*/c=us/admd= /prmd=ceridian/o=cdev/ou=cc-lan/ou=cchsgate/s=WEBSTER/g=CLARK/i=F/"@MHS>
X400-Recipients:
non-disclosure;
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tGpzq-0000HXC; Sat, 18 Nov 95 10:20 CST
X400-Originator:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"zsxre1.0.mF6.oUWhm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Clark F Webster" <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
X400-Received:
by /c=us/admd=/prmd=ceridian/; Relayed; 17 Nov 1995 16:32:52 -0600 by mta corona.cdev.com in /c=us/admd=/prmd=ceridian/; Relayed; 17 Nov 1995 16:32:52 -0600
Alternate-Recipient:
Allowed
Content-Identifier:
023B930AD0D94001
Parts/Attachments:
Re: (494 bytes) , ATTACH01.TXT (1347 bytes)

  Many companies do what your design group dose and than indicates the
  design line width and spacing as "master pattern dimension."  They then
  give the minimum line width and spacing.  The PWB supplier can choose to
  use the designed lines or modify them for their process.
  To:       TechNet @ ipc.org at Internet@CCMAILEXCHANGE
  cc:        (bcc: Clark F Webster/CDev/Ceridian)
  From:     TechNet @ ipc.org at Internet@CCMAILEXCHANGE
  Date:     11/17/95 12:11:00 PM
  Subject:   Re: PWB artwork



 you are absolutely correct Mark. let your PCB suppliers adjust the gerber  to meet your finished line specs. everyone has a little different etch  factor. ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: PWB artwork Author: [log in to unmask] at corp Date: 11/16/95 4:36 PM I have a question for the Printed circuit Manufacturers. First a little history. The PWB design group in my company adjusts the artwork (track width & Spacing) to conpensate for the loss of copper during the etching process. I have a concern that the etching depends on each PWB manufacturers process and that each manufacturer would like to make his (or her) own adjustments to the artwork / gerber data to achieve the final engineering requirements Which we also specify on the drawing (Example shown below)      Minimum conductor spacing:      External layers to be .008 inch after plating and fusing or solder      coating. Internal layers to be .008 after etching.      Minimum conductor width:      External layers to be .010 inch after plating and fusing or solder      coating. internal layers to be .010 inch after etching.) I feel that we are over controlling the PWB manufacturers. Is this true? Please provide feedback. Thanh you in advance.                             Mark Foster                             Address: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2