Subject: | |
From: | "esvax::mrgate::a1::kenyonwg"@esvax.dnet.dupont.com |
Date: | Thu, 16 May 96 09:57:29 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: NAME: WILLIAM G KENYON
FUNC: Chemicals/Electronics
TEL: 302-652-4272 <KENYONWG AT A1 AT ESVAX>
To: NAME: [log in to unmask] <"[log in to unmask]"@ESDS01@MRGATE@ESVAX>
Boeing and ECD have provided excellent input on this issue.
There is another point that needs to be brought out. Saponifiers
work by chemical reaction with the rosin to form a water
removable rosin soap. Unlike all the other cleaning processes
that depend on dissolving the soil, saponification depends on
chemically reacting with it. Chemical reactions are a function
of concentration of the reactants and temperature. Also, only a
certain percentage of molecular collisions have the two molecules
oriented correctly to give the desired reaction. Also when the
typical measure of saponifier (pH) drops by 1 unit, it means that
you have only 0.1 of the previous level of saponifier, since pH
is a log scale. The typical way to compensate for these factors
is to overload the system with saponifier, which can lead to
compatibility problems. When someone does find an accurate
method of tracking just the active saponifier concentration, then
this information could be fed back into a saponifier drip feed
addition system and the belt speed, so that if the saponifier
feed went down, the belt speed would slow to compensate for the
reduced saponifier concentration. So inventors- here's your
chance!
-Bill Kenyon
302-652-4272/-5701 T/F
|
|
|