TECHNET Archives

April 2009

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:11:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
Bob,

My two cents for the Friday - If I read the question correctly, you are
asking about adhering either a 0.1um tin plated part, or a 2um tin plated
part to bare, non-metallized FR-4.

Given that the tin plated components are virgin/not oxidized, it is my
belief that the adhesive will adhere much better to the bare FR-4 than to
either of the tin plated components.  In the virgin state, I would not
expect much, if any difference between them.

Should the Sn plated components have been subjected to a thermal exposure of
some kind - what was formerly beneath the thin Sn plating may now also be
oxidized and corrupting the surface making it's interface weaker sooner.

Heat cure adhesive, UV, or room temp? - I am not a great fan of adhesively
bonding [long term] to Sn.  The higher the heat cure, likely the worse it
will get.



Will see how much other traffic this starts  :-)

Steve



-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of bob wettermann
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Friday Theorizing

Dear Technetters:

Has anyone done any adhesion testing of a 2um tin-electrocoated surface
(copper carrier) to FR-4? How about a 0.100um tin electrocoated surface? Can
someone theorize on which might give better adhesion using a 2-part epoxy?

Regards

 Bob Wettermann
BEST
PH 847-767-5745

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2