TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uwamw-0000QuC; Fri, 30 Aug 96 16:07 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
30 Aug 96 17:06:05 EDT
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/6039
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
From [log in to unmask] Fri Aug 30 16:
52:06 1996
Resent-Message-ID:
<"U5qn93.0.kwA.PWr9o"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"72030,3271" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Resent-From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
We are a double-sided bare board manufacturer, and for the first time a
customer of ours is considering the use of chip-on-board technology in their
design. Since we have no experience in fabricating for this purpose, we would
like to know what issues and specifications we'll be facing...such as final
finishes, geometry, tolerances, etc., that will be required by the wire
bonder/assembler. It's my understanding that the COB device has 8 leads.

Thanks in advance for any input.

Bill
[log in to unmask]

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2