TECHNET Archives

February 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:54:50 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Gumpert, Ben" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Gumpert, Ben" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
If you are taking guesses - mine is 'no'.
The difference is just purity, right? But I'm not sure that you care too much about purity in a He leak test - impurities shouldn't prevent any leaking.

Ben

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Hillman
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:06 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: EXTERNAL: [TN] Helium Quality Test Influence Question

Hi gang - hey, need some quick assistance. Does anyone know if using "commercial" grade He instead of "analytical" grade He would cause an issue in helium leak testing? I think I know the answer but looking for a sanity check.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2