TECHNET Archives

September 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gary Camac <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 15:14:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Ken,

If I understand your question correctly, yes, we have always used our solderability
sample for our cross- sectioning.  That way you have a thermally stressed hole to cross
section.  This board is usually a sample taken from the lot we receive from the pwb
vendor.

Gary Camac


Ken Patel wrote:

> Does anyone has preference to use solder sample v/s good board for
> micro-sectioning? I mean, why I should not use solder sample board for
> micro-section analysis as I can save one good board. If there are good
> reasons I want to use good board for cross section. Is there any compelling
> reason?
>
> re,
> ken patel
> ______________________________________________________
> Ken Patel                       Phone:  (408) 490-6804
> 1708 McCarthy Blvd.             Fax:    (408) 490-6859
> Milpitas, CA 95035              Beeper: (888) 769-1808

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2