TECHNET Archives

February 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 15:21:25 EST
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
From:
Lyle Wallig <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
It has been pointed out by several of the Technet responders that many
factors are involved in making a prepreg thickness determination.
 I would like to add that a standard testing procedure used by prepreg
producers for determining the prepreg pressed thickness is to take multiple
plies of prepreg (i.e., 10 sheets or so) press them under some standard
condition of pressure and temperature and time and then measure with a
micrometer the pressed thickness of the stack.   Dividing that thickness
number by number of plies of prepreg used in the test is usually the number
that appears in the product data sheet for pressed thickness.

Regards,
Lyle Wallig

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2