TECHNET Archives

January 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:48:49 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hi Richard

To the best of my knowledge that was called up by IPC 6012. I don't know whether this is under review - but it should be (2007 = 5 year rule). I will take this matter up with the group at APEX.

I suggest you apply some caution to the veracity of any data you produce, as the method really needs to be updated. The old Bellcore GR-78-CORE was superceded by method 2.6.3.7

Hope this helps

Graham Naisbitt – Vice-Chairman IPC TGs: SIR / ECM; CAF & 7-11 Test methods Sub-Committee, IEC TC91 WG3 Project Leader, BSi EPL 501, UK IAG
E: [log in to unmask]
T: 012 5252 1500



On 7 Jan 2013, at 20:29, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Can anyone tell me which IPC bare board documents references test method 2.6.3.5 to meet a minimum SIR requirement?
> 
> Rich  Kraszewski - Plexus Engineering 
>  
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2