TECHNET Archives

June 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerald Bogert <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:23:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
June 11, 2012

The MIL-PRF-81705 spec is still listed as an active spec as of Feb 2010
so it would appear that some folks should be able to manufacture the
material unless the DoD plans on superseding the spec.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Glidden, Kevin
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 10:59 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] MIL-PRF-81705D vs EIA-541

All,

We have historically used the subject specification for purchase of our
static shielding bags.  However, I have been informed that they are no
longer specified against this spec but most major vendors.  Indeed,
looking at some of the major suppliers (3M, Desco, Uline) the bags no
longer reference the 81705 and instead reference the EIA 541.  Does
anyone have background info on why the change?
Thanks,


Kevin Glidden


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2