TECHNET Archives

August 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
TechNet Mail Forum<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 21 Aug 1997 11:18:28 -0500
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
"TechNet Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Charles Barker@IO-US
08/21/97 11:18 AM

Does anyone know of or has anyone on TechNet done any studies relating
efficiency and actual increase in productivity to increased hours worked?

At what point does the number of extra hours put in per day, times the
number of consecutive days they are put in, begin to cause the increased
number of errors and defects generated to wipe out any extra production
achieved by working the extra time?  In other words, what is the point of
diminishing returns?

Does anyone have or know where I can find data correlating  to 8, 10, 12,
14 or even 15 hr days? For 3, 4, 5, or 6 straight days?

TIA


ATOM RSS1 RSS2