TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Doug McKean)
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 12 Nov 1996 12:17:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Jim, 

UL is based on approx. 0.6 volts. 

I've seen others based on approx 0.25 volts. 

How much is too much?  

Well, for UL-1950 approval, follow their Table J.1 (page 187) in the 3rd edition. 

Otherwise, I believe there will be a trade-off among several factors: 

  1. What will be imposed upon the design, 

  2. Wet/dry environment and temperature, 

  3. Cost of material to comply, 

  4. The level of electrical current being run through the junction, 

etc, etc, ...

*******************************************************
Doug McKean
[log in to unmask]
-------------------------------------------------------
The comments and opinions stated herein are mine alone,
and do not reflect those of my employer.
-------------------------------------------------------
*******************************************************

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2