TECHNET Archives

March 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Optimum Baume Ferric Chloride For Stainless Steel
From:
"Larry J. Fisher" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Sun, 4 Mar 2001 07:58:19 EST
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (486 bytes) , text/html (598 bytes) 
I have a customer who is using standard aqueous dry film on #301, #302 &
#316L stainless steel and then etching with ferric chloride (this is actually
a chemical milling process, not really printed circuits). He is having slight
undercut under the dry film which dulls the surface (unacceptable to his
customer). He is using 45 Baume strength ferric chloride and has asked if
either lower or higher strength would work better and not cause the undercut.
Any ideas out there?

Regards,

Larry Fisher

ATOM RSS1 RSS2