Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 13 11: |
06:38 1996 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
X-Sender: |
jmarcy@hp7001 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"3k1bL3.0.d2F.jmt6n"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tkw5H-0000CAC; Fri, 9 Feb 96 10:54 CST |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Feb 1996 09:56:21 -0700 |
X-Mailer: |
Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
SECOND AND LAST CALL TO RESPOND
We are considering the benefits of such additive process technologies as
SLC, Dycostrate etc. and the associated microvias attainable with laser,
plasma etc. I need to gather information on cost trade-offs and have read
within this forum that the traditional cost per area metric is not
applicable size the same size area can easily contain substantially more
devices & I/O's. Can anyone share some cost modeling or analysis they have
done in this area? How about the board shops in this network that are
pursuing the introduction of these technologies-how will you assist your
customers with cost tradeoff info?
Additionally I would like to understand the reworkability or lack thereof
with such technologies. Thanks in advance for your technical advice.
|
|
|