TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 13 11:
06:38 1996
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2597
X-Sender:
jmarcy@hp7001
TO:
Return-Path:
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"3k1bL3.0.d2F.jmt6n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Jenni Marcy)
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tkw5H-0000CAC; Fri, 9 Feb 96 10:54 CST
Date:
Fri, 9 Feb 1996 09:56:21 -0700
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
SECOND AND LAST CALL TO RESPOND
We are considering the benefits of such additive process technologies as
SLC, Dycostrate etc. and the associated microvias attainable with laser,
plasma etc.  I need to gather information on cost trade-offs and have read
within this forum that the traditional cost per area metric is not
applicable size the same size area can easily contain substantially more
devices & I/O's.  Can anyone share some cost modeling or analysis they have
done in this area?  How about the board shops in this network that are
pursuing the introduction of these technologies-how will you assist your
customers with cost tradeoff info?
Additionally I would like to understand the reworkability or lack thereof
with such technologies.  Thanks in advance for your technical advice.



ATOM RSS1 RSS2