TECHNET Archives

January 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vn3Nk-0000SBC; Wed, 22 Jan 97 08:10 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References:
Date:
Wed, 22 Jan 1997 08:25:57 -0800
From [log in to unmask] Thu Jan 23 13:
42:36 1997
Precedence:
list
Reply-To:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/9469
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
X-Loop:
Resent-From:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Resent-Message-ID:
<"0SFGk3.0.nR6.J_Xvo"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Steve Collins <[log in to unmask]>
Old-Return-Path:
Message-ID:
Organization:
TSX Corporation
X-Mailer:
Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Robert Cronin wrote:
> 
> I read the responses to the inquiry from Ron Oneal on breakaway tab
> remnants. We use the same specifications that John Laur had mentioned
> (four 0.036 in. holes spaced 0.050 in. apart).
> 
>   My question has do with the other side of the breakaway holes facing
> into the board. I have not found any specific recommendations on how
> close traces should be to these breakaway holes. We have a board (0.062
> in. thick) that has a trace that is 0.079 inches away from these four
> breakaway holes, and we occassionally have a board scrapped out due to
> trace damage during breakaway (our last lot of 40 boards had 1 board
> scrapped for this). The board is double sided and has a high expense at
> this point. Occassionally a very small piece of fiberglass will tear
> away with the breakaway portion and damage a trace.
> 
>  We have discussed what would be a reasonable trace spacing from the
> breakaway holes to prevent this occassional scrap from happening. The
> initial figure of 0.200 inch spacing was deemed way to much by the
> design community. Another suggestion of two times the board thickness
> (0.124 inches in this case) was proposed.
> 
> 1) Has anyone else seen similiar damage of this sort during breakaway ?
> 2) Is there anyone who has experience with a miminum trace spacing from
>    breakaway holes that works well ?
> 3) Is there an accepted standard or Rule of Thumb (such as two times the
>    board thickness) that anyone has used without incident in moderate
>     volumes (200 plus a month)?
> 
> Thank You in advance for any comments.
> Bob Cronin
> Eastman Kodak

Bob, Just a suggestion for your production people would be to switch
from actually breaking parts out of panel to using pnumatic shears to
cut the board out. I have used this methode in a past life with a great
deal of success.

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2