 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2012 17:29:29 +0100 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dewey - That's shocking.
Graham N
On 11 May 2012, at 16:41, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) wrote:
> Since Inge and Doug pinged me; this is Friday; and there is always an element of truth in what I say: I thought I would pass this along to show you do not suffer alone.
> We had a non-procurable part (ceramic resistor network) and I had rejected the alternate. After several meetings concerning placement, testing, signal integrity and the like we came to a plan
> I promptly told the team "Thankfully, our resistance to change did not impede our capacitance for success.
> Dewey
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
