TECHNET Archives

August 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:51:54 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Some 35 years ago Science magazine had a lengthy story about contemporary oil production at seabeds from what might have been abiotic source(s).  The authors estimated, as well or as poorly as I can recall, production in the Atlantic was approximately 20 barrels per year.  Louis Hart

PS  Sun and Earth revolve around their mutual center of mass.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brian Ellis
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] NTC - I believe ... (my credo)

The abiotic hypothesis (it is not a theory) has been around for many years but no one has yet been able to provide enough evidence to take it beyond speculation. On the other hand, there is plenty of scientific evidence for the biotic theory.

On 27/08/2014 16:46, Larson, Mark wrote:
> You sun revolves around the earth people need to educate yourselves 
> that there is no such thing as "fossil" fuels
>
> http://www.wnd.com/2008/02/45838/
>
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2