TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (denise rooke)
Date:
Tue, 19 Dec 1995 23:05:00 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
The question is, is the void caused due to lack of sufficient copper
coverage before etching, or, is the void due to a lack of etch resist
coverage during etch?

I have seen this before in the "old days" when solder plating used for etch
resist was out of control. These days, due to HASL finish there is little
attention generally given to etch resist plating coverage... that is until
you have a problem. What is your etch resist method? Is the chemistry in
control? Taken any microsections before etching lately? Check for organics?
How are your anodes?

Hope this helps... good luck
Dave


>We have experienced a random problem with three or four parts relative to rim
>voids.
>
>In some cases it was part of the lot and in others it was the whole lot. 
>
>They have been partial, full, top and or bottom. (no consistency) 
>
>They are typically one to two mils down from the surface copper and one to
>three mils in height. 
>
>They are not specific to any hole size. 
>
>We use Dupont APG715 Dry Film, and develop on a Atotech/Chemcut horizontal
>system using Potassium Carbonate.
>
>
>
>I would appreciate any suggestions, as to the cause.
>
>
>
>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2