 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sn59m-0000HOC; Mon, 28 Aug 95 09:27 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!smtpgate.tcs.teradyne.com!lisa_greenleaf> |
| Date: |
28 Aug 1995 08:22:10 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"PO_5r2.0.ThL.69TGm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.2 |
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
39:23 1996 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have recently reviewed the list of cancelled MIL SPEC's which includes
several "industry biggies" such as MIL STD 2000, MIL STD 105, MIL C 28809,etc.
in addition to the upcoming "changes to" MIL P 55110 (replacement by MIL P
RRRRR, now known as MIL PRF 31032).
My question is how are other companies reacting to these changes, and how are
they being handled internally? What does all this mean? It seems like the
times are changing and these activities are extremely important and critical,
yet noone seems to be acting or reacting. Feedback please!!
Lisa Greenleaf
Teradyne Circuits Operation
603-880-9461 x 118
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
