TECHNET Archives

February 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:32:42 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (805 bytes) , text/html (2341 bytes)
FW: Water soluble w/BGAI would be the first to admit I am not an expert, but
cleaning under a low stand-off BGA is a major problem.   And water soluble
flux residues are definitely not something you want left on a board.

Chris Christian
Indium Corporation of America
  -----Original Message-----
  From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mary Jane Chism
  Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:11 PM
  To: [log in to unmask]
  Subject: [TN] FW: Water soluble w/BGA





  -----Original Message-----
  From:   Mary Jane Chism
  Sent:   Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:27 PM
  To:     [log in to unmask]
  Subject:        Water soluble w/BGA

  I wanted to present this question out to the experts; What do you think
about the validity of using water soluble flux with BGAs? Do you see a
"residue" issue? Thanks.

  Mary Jane Chism



ATOM RSS1 RSS2