Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uHBHc-0000CZC; Wed, 8 May 96 10:36 CDT |
Sender: |
|
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 08 May 96 15:19:01 -0400 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Posted: |
Wed, 08 May 96 15:32:01 -0400 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"pMjZx2.0.nZ8.dzBan"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
"Jim Marsico" <"marsico%Organization=Industrial & Mfg'g Engineering%Telephone=516-595-5879"@a1.allin1.ALLIN1.umc> |
X-Loop: |
|
Msg-Class: |
ALL-IN-1 IOS Server for VMS V3.0 PBL123A (US) ENGLISH 21-MAR-1992 |
Message-Id: |
<41931180506991/182209@ALLIN1> |
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 18: |
16:19 1996 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We at AIL Systems are in the process of switching to non-rosin (water soluble)
fluxes for use on military hardware... yes, even MIL-STD-2000 contracts. We
have selected a flux which was listed on the QPL for MIL-F-14256 (this makes
the DoD guys feel better). We have successfully passed qualification to
ANSI/J-STD-001A, which is the same test as NAWCADLKE-MISC-05-MT0002 (whew!),
which was slated as the qualification test for MIL-STD-2000B prior to it's
cancellation.
We are in the process of asking the individual procuring activities for our
various contracts permission to use the qualified flux/process. At this time,
we haven't/don't expect negative responses, we already have received some
approvals.
If you want to discuss this in more detail, please feel free to call or write.
Jim Marsico
(516) 595-5879
[log in to unmask]
********************************
* ______ _ _ _____ *
* / ___ | | | | | _____ *
* / /___| | | | | | _____ *
* __/ ____ | | | | |______ *
* |____/ |_| |_| |________| *
* *
* SYSTEMS, INC. *
********************************
|
|
|