 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0ur1Ri-0000NOC; Thu, 15 Aug 96 07:22 CDT |
| Encoding: |
12 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 15 Aug 96 07:31:00 PDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| From [log in to unmask] Thu Aug 15 13: |
27:01 1996 |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"BLmBv1.0.CaK.HQn4o"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This question has come up again. What are the adverse affects of gold
plated terminations on SMT components?
We have been seeing a number of new sample components with gold
terminations, and to date, have disqualified them based on gold
embrittlement. . Many of the vendors reps say that this issue is new to
them and that they sell these parts all over with no questions/problems. Is
this still an issue? If so, why are these vendors supplying parts,
especially taped/reeled parts, with gold on them? Tinning these would be
expensive and hardly practical.
Is there a spec/study/whatever that shows the maximum deposition of
gold before it becomes a problem?
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
