TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Alexis Meehan)
Date:
Thu, 5 Dec 1996 11:54:20 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
     Techies:
     
     Our engineering department wishes to use a MELF package (National 
     Semiconductor LL-34) for a diode on a new design. They intend to mount 
     this part on the bottom side of the PCB. Last I heard, this type of 
     package caused major headaches and extra cost during assembly. Has 
     anyone out there used this package in high-volume production? What are 
     the known pitfalls today? What percentage increase in assembly cost 
     can we expect (if any)? What footprint works the best (SM-782 has 2 
     recommendations, one has notched pads to help keep the part from 
     rolling)? Any other gotchas we should be aware of? 
     
     Thank you in advance for your help - Alexis Meehan - ATI

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2