TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 30 Dec 1996 08:14:26 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Mon Dec 30 09:
31:20 1996
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/8858
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"oSkUK.0.mS6.Axxno"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Jack Crawford)
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vehS7-0000S6C; Mon, 30 Dec 96 07:08 CST
Cc:
Message-Id:
<v01540b05aeed7050ed81@[204.180.62.40]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Check out the EMPF home page at www.empf.org

Who is [log in to unmask]  Seeing several postings over the last several
days, but no signature line or other info.
**********
>Suppose I could generate the capital to create a Model Shop.  Suppose I
>could not but would seek it?
>
>I know there are salesmen fishing technet, so I ask this,"For
>advertising and passage through the gate,  would companies contribute
>vanguard technology in return?"
>
>This would be a logical maneuver because in my opinion no one supplier
>holds the best technology for an entire process.  A union of technology
>from around the world would further the understanding of EACH component
>as applied to the overall process. THE IDEA IS THAT THE WHOLE IS NOT THE
>sum of the parts BUT THE SUM OF THE COMPATIBILITY OF THE PARTS.
>
>The Model Shop would then open for production (to maintain
>profitability) AND allow parties investing outside technology to see the
>outcome and compatibilities of technology.  Perhaps partner inquiries
>could generate shared patents that each might not have come upon.
>
>Suppose this Model Shop could assemble a work force like no other.
>Suppose that the Model Shop could venture into production while research
>took place.  Are there many places where companies with newly patented
>technologies can vie for positions in real world tests without
>determining that results were peculiar to the dynamics of a setup.
>
>Would current shops not benefit because a number of choice technologies
>could simultaneously be brought in, which would ensure the compatibility
>and successfulness of the purchase?
>
>Build it, and They Will Come!
>
>Criticize the Dreamers, and There Will Be No Dreams!
>
>
>[log in to unmask]

***ALL NEW EMPF PHONE NUMBERS***

                      Jack Crawford
                  HelpLine Manager
    Electronics Mfg. Productivity Facility
****NEW--317.655.3688--NEW****
*****FAX  317-655-3699 NEW ****
          714 N Senate Ave, Suite 100
         Indianapolis IN  46202-3112
          VISIT OUR HOME PAGE AT:
                http://www.empf.org
            [log in to unmask]


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2