TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Fri, 13 Oct 95 12:05:03
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)

     
        I don't know if this help's you much but our customers spec for your 
same situatiion is 20.0 in/lbs. This has not been a problem in the past. One 
note is that we calibrate our torque drivers once a month.

Hope this helps

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Torque
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ~INTERNET
Date:    10/13/95 9:05 AM


Received: by ccmail
Received:  from netcomsv by pragma.com (UUPC/extended 1.11) with UUCP;
           Fri, 13 Oct 1995 09:04:48 PDT
Received: from miso.wwa.com by netcomsv.netcom.com with SMTP (8.6.12/SMI-4.1)
    id IAA07489; Fri, 13 Oct 1995 08:46:16 -0700
Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 08:46:16 -0700 
Received: from ipc by miso.wwa.com with uucp
    (Smail3.1.28.1 #8) id m0t3mJw-000iDZC; Fri, 13 Oct 95 10:46 CDT
Received: by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
    id m0t3l5w-0000GpC; Fri, 13 Oct 95 09:28 CDT
Old-Return-Path: <miso!uunet.uu.net!medar!medar.com!mcussen> 
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 95 07:36 EDT
From: [log in to unmask] (Mike Cussen) 
X-ccAdmin: postmaster@netcomsv
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Torque
Cc: [log in to unmask]
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Resent-Message-ID: <"9ZXCA1.0.NsA.2UdVm"@ipc> 
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
X-ccAdmin: postmaster@netcomsv
X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1359 
X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
     
 Dear Scholars,
     
 I would like to know if there is information available, or opinions that 
 address this subject of torque.
 September 20, 1995
     
Our design engineers have requested a torque specification for a 
circuit board. This is a two layers board, FR-4 material, thickness 
0.062", and copper is 2oz. This torque requirement is due to a 
mechanical assembly operation. We are inserting a threaded SCR 
through the circuit board, where we will secure this device with a 
lock washer and nut. This assembly operation is very similar to 
your (IPC'S) description on page 10, fig. 2-10 of the 
"Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies," the only difference is 
there is no insulating washer.
     
I do have the torque specification for the part being assembled 
which is 22 Lb.in (US-units), and I found no problems with this 
pressure. 
     
Still the design engineer is requiring the torque specification for 
the FR-4 product.
     
Can you please assist me in qualifing this torque requirement.
     
My first concers are, could an assembler tighten this part tight enough to 
crush the barrels or feed-throughs. "I will answer that myself," if no 
constraints are given, sure with a big enough vise or lever damage would 
occur.
     
     
Sincerely your,
Medar Inc,
Michael Cussen
     
     
     
     
     



ATOM RSS1 RSS2