Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vaMWh-0000QBC; Wed, 18 Dec 96 07:59 CST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 1996 08:40:28 -0500 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
Content-Length: |
1002 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"AK3ht.0.mKG.lY_jo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Wed Dec 18 08: |
25:16 1996 |
Content-Id: |
<1330_11182_850916426_4@kawasaki> |
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-Id: |
<1330_11182_850916426_3@kawasaki> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We presently route out multi-ups but would like to get away from the
router on some designs if possible.
Could anyone supply design guidelines or rules/equations to allow a
"breakaway" process (seperate multi-ups by snapping them apart)?
Thanks in advance!
I just learned of this TechNet, and it's A GREAT THING!!!
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|