TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 17 Oct 1996 19:38:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Rudy 

The unfused tin/lead finish was used very frequently in the 60's and 70's and
if cleaned and stored properly had good solderabability for wave solder
applications using RMA fluxes.  I used the finish for at least 10 years with
good results.  The only problem was tin/lead slivers and if you use tin, a
major problem is also tin slivers.  The factory where I worked had a avg, RH
of 28% and both unfused tin/lead and unfused tin were used and boards were
stored an average of 6 months.  The bright or semi bright unfused tin plates
have a good shelf life and In test that I have run were very satisfactory
after two years of storage.  The sliver problem was usually alleviated by
building a slight mushroom with the copper and then plating the tin/lead
covering. over the mushroom so that there was no overhang of the tin/lead
that was not supported by copper.

As David mentioned, the use of a thin 0.0002-0.0003 in. of tin/lead plate as
a final finish is not infrequently used for surface mount to provide a flat
land and they are soldered with standard no-clean and RMA fluxes.  Good
storage conditions, again, are desirable.

Phi Hinton 
[log in to unmask] 

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2