TECHNET Archives

October 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: BGA REWORK
From:
Darrel Therriault <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:10:23 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (437 bytes) , text/html (690 bytes) 
Gaby,

We tried rework both with and without solderpaste and found screening paste
worked much better.

That is our standard rework method for BGA replacement now, clean, screen,
reflow.

DT




At 11:03 AM 10/26/00 +0200, you wrote:

>Dear Technetters
>
>We are starting to rework BGA's.
>
>A controversy arised about the necessity of solder paste for BGA's with
>eutectic solder balls.
>
>Please send your opinion and your general procedure.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Gaby

ATOM RSS1 RSS2