Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0t35mz-0000H5C; Wed, 11 Oct 95 13:22 CDT |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 1995 13:48:12 -0400 (EDT) |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
cc: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
03:35 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"hDLSA3.0.TRC.Vi0Vm"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
There is actually a lot of data regarding conductive adhesives on nearly
every substrate, many by independent organizations; IVF (Swedish Research
Institute), DELTA (Danish Research Group), MCC. Adhesives can be designed
for good junction stability on Sn/Pb and several companies are in
production with same. Our criterion is less than 20% change in junction
resistance after 1000 hr. 85/85 and a properly designed product can
actually increase in conductivity after T&H. The real weakness (based on
customer response) is lower mechanical strength and poor shock (NCMS drop
test) resistance compared to Sn/Pb, especially with J-leads. Adhesives
work in many, but not all applications. For more information, see article
Polymer Electronics at Web site http:/www.alphametals.com and/or read the
new book, "Polymer Thick Film", Van Nostrand Rheinhold, NY, which covers
adhesive assembly.
|
|
|