TECHNET Archives

September 1999

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 9 Sep 1999 22:03:23 EDT
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Ammoniacal vs Cupric chloride Etcher.
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
[log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
Lenny,

My experience is similar to Yu-Shan's. Ammoniacal is typically 50% to 67%
faster.

Regards,
Chris McGary
Dexter

##############################################################
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
##############################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TECHNET <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TECHNET
##############################################################
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information.
If you need assistance - contact Gayatri Sardeshpande at [log in to unmask] or
847-509-9700 ext.5365
##############################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2