TECHNET Archives

February 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vsEDR-0000ZcC; Wed, 5 Feb 97 14:45 CST
Encoding:
52 Text
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 05 Feb 97 13:18:53 cst
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Cc:
X-Status:
Status:
O
From [log in to unmask] Fri Feb 7 14:
22:50 1997
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"89Sxk3.0.gCK.N5F-o"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"ddhillma" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/9985
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
     Hi Greg - 
     
     Take a look at MIL-STD-883, Method 1009.8 Salt Atmosphere. Although 
     this method is written around testing parts, finishes, etc. it can be 
     done on functional assemblies provided you and your customer agree on 
     what will simulate the use environment. We have done this test with 
     modifications on functional electronics for customers with salt water 
     concerns (you would be surprised how wet it is on a ship in the 
     Pacific!). You don't want to use the test method blindly but it could 
     be of use to you. Good Luck.
     
     
     Dave Hillman
     Rockwell Collins
     [log in to unmask]


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: ASSY/TEST- Salt Fog Test
Author:  [log in to unmask] at ccmgw1
Date:    2/5/97 11:50 AM


                      Subject:                              Time:  9:18 AM
  OFFICE MEMO         ASSY/TEST: Salt Fog Test              Date:  2/5/97
     
We have been asked to conduct a Salt Fog Test on some assembled, functional 
boards, and I have some questions.  First, I'm not sure that this is really 
an appropriate test to run.  I've found method 509.3 in Mil Std 810E (July 
89), but nothing else.  It sounds pretty tough to control.  Are people 
actually conducting this test now, or are alternative assembly and chassis 
level corrosion tests being specified?  What test labs are equipped to 
perform them?
     
I would be grateful to learn from anyone who is doing this test now. 
     
Regards,
Greg Bartlett
Mercury Computer Systems
Chelmsford, MA
[log in to unmask]
     
*************************************************************************** 
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 * 
*************************************************************************** 
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           * 
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        * 
*************************************************************************** 
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   * 
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      * 
***************************************************************************
     

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2