TECHNET Archives

October 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 28 Oct 1997 18:41:48 -0500
Reply-To:
Tom Monico <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Tom Monico <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
John,

I did an extensive evaluation between the two films, however I was
evaluating Dupont film, which to my understanding is Agfa film in a Dupont
box. The bottom line is that both films compare equally except the Kodak
film has a better line edge. I was able to image and develop a 1 mil line
with the Kodak film. The Dupont film did not perform as well. If you run a
comparison, pay particular attention to the line edge. The difference is
minor, but enough to be our deciding factor. I have always used Kodak and
have never been disappointed. They are typically higher priced and they'll
justify it by telling you they have a superior product. In my opinion it is.

Tom Monico
Continental Circuits, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Parsons <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2