TECHNET Archives

December 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: mesh size
From:
"Dan R. Johnson" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 20 Dec 2001 07:18:37 -0800
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (337 bytes) , text/html (679 bytes) 
Thanks John, this confirms what I thought. I don't know if you could say the aspect ratio is "right" but I am using a .13X.26mm paste pad. This is an Rf application and the design engineer is adamant that all component pads be as small as possible.
You mentioned the ball size to aperture size ratio, is there a "rule of thumb" for this?
Dan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2