TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 25 Apr 96 20:49:41 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)

De:   Coderre - JCCODERR BRMVM1
***************************************************************
CLASSIFICATION    NON-CLASSIFIE ( )       CONFIDENTIEL ( )
Objet:   Skip plating
Reply:
<Reply>
As an electroless nickel/gold shop, we have seen this condition in
some cases. The suggested analytical approach is as follows:
  - good visual inspection at high magnification
  - SEM + EDX analysis
  - Auger analysis
Please check to see if the defect is repetitive (it sometimes is).
If so, use these techniques prior to plating.
Hope this helps...

Jacques Coderre
IBM Microelectronics
Plating engineering manager
[log in to unmask]
*************************************************************************
Received: from simon.ipc.org by vnet.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with TCP;
Thu, 25 Apr 96 09:20:35 EDT
>From ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
 	 id IAA06189; Thu, 25 Apr 1996 08:21:03 -0700
 Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 08:21:03 -0700
 Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
 	id m0uCQbo-00007YC; Thu, 25 Apr 96 07:57 CDT
 Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
 Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 1996 21:00:05 +0800 (MYT)
 Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
 X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
 To: [log in to unmask]
 From: tonghh <[log in to unmask]>
 Subject: Exposed copper after electroless nickel gold
 Resent-Message-ID: <"aFnt03.0._u5.gQtVn"@ipc>
 Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
 X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3638
 X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
 Precedence: list
 Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]

 Recently we encounter exposed copper problem after electroless nickel
 gold process ,
 we wish to know if there any way to determine the stubborn film on top
 of the copper
 that prevent the plating to take place . We understand that soldermask
 on pad or
 poor rinsing after final development could give rise to such problem .
 Such problem
 of soldermask on pad could be easily found after HAL but cases of minor
 soldermask
 on pad could not be detected in HAL . Please advise .

Merci/Regards
Directeur Ingenierie MLC / MLC ENG. MGR
Dept 881/23 BRMT (tel. 514-534-6591, US tieline 552)
INTERNET ADDRESS [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2