TECHNET Archives

August 2016

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Aug 2016 21:46:08 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "MacFadden, Todd" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"MacFadden, Todd" <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
"Leong, MengKong" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Hi everyone,

According to IPC-6013 Table 3-18, Note 2: "...for Cu weights 1/2oz and above, the process allowance reduction allows for one extra rework."

My interpretation is this refers to the full process allowance reduction, 4um. Hence, for 1/2oz Cu, if the "Minimum Final Finish after Processing" is 11.4um, this rework allowance would mean the actual minimum Cu thickness could be as low as 11.4 - 4 = 7.4um.

Is that the correct interpretation? If not, what is meant by "rework" and how much reduction does it allow?

Thanks,
Todd


-------------------------------------------------------
Todd MacFadden
Component Reliability Engineering
Bose Corporation
1 New York Ave, MS 415
Framingham, MA 01701
508.766.6259
-------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2