Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:35:55 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<008401d0d429$e321dfa0$a9659ee0$@com> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
In-Reply-To: |
<52135AE4151D8343B16989B2BFBED7DAC58597895A@pfc-dc01> |
Organization: |
R&D Interconnect Solutions.com |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If Werner were alive he would be reminding us that silver, like gold, is a
contaminate in tin solder.
Early finishes, prior to 2005 or so, weren't good for multiple reflows. Some
presumed it was too thin.
I believe the problem was the durability of the organic additives that
retard oxidation of the silver.
Not perfect, but it is my preferred surface finish, but not too thick.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Kelly
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 3:47 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] immersion silver
Hi All,
Why would someone choose thick immersion silver over thin? Are these
different chemistries? Regards Steve Kelly
Phone(O) (416) 750-8433
Phone (C) (416) 577-8433
If the recipient to whom this e-mail is sent has an NDA with PFC Flexible
Circuits Limited this e-mail is considered confidential and is subject to
any NDA agreements between the respective parties.
See PFC on "How its' Made" in Canada on July 7th at 8 p.m. on the Discovery
Channel
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|