Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 1997 10:33 -0800 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
From [log in to unmask] Mon Mar 31 14: |
50:06 1997 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"qboLv1.0.iUK.D70Gp"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wBlmg-000BjbC; Mon, 31 Mar 97 12:26 CST |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have noticed numerous posting on the best microsection etchant to use.
There are merits and disadvantages in the etchants mentioned to date. I
specifically would like to discuss the sodium dichromate and the ammonium
hydroxide & hydrogen peroxide.
The ammonium hydorxide & hydrogen peroxide is 1 of the more unstable
copper etchants that does an excellent job of microetching. The most
attractive attribute of this etchant is in the hands of a less skilled or
naive person, the etchant will not overetch the surface to the severity
of a chromate etchant. (Not say that only less skilled people use this
etchant) I define 'instability' as variable etch quality over a short
period of time (hours). At Merix, we make enough etchant to microetch
the work at hand and discard the remainder.
The soduim dichromate etchant is a stable etchant (last for months) that
is more agressive than the ammonium hydroxide & hydrogen peroxide
etchant. The aggressive nature of this etchant requires greater skill by
the user to prevent the surface from being overetched which hides cracks
and separations. I used the sodium dichromate etchant at my prior
employer for 15 years and was able to detect separations and cracks.
While I worked at this employer, we published papers on our ability to
detect separations and our concerns that separation was being shipped.
This leads me to believe the type of etchant is not so important as the
user of the etchant. One of my favorite BC cartoons is a caption that "If
you don't know what it does; don't screw with it". The skill and
knowledge of the user is as impotant as the etchant itself. IPC-MS-810
lists the types of etchants that are recommended for etching of
microsections. Whatever etchant is chosen for use, the key is to create
the desired etch quality of the surface to make wise decisions on
quality. The primary qualities are a faint definition of the electroless
line, strike platre line (as applicable), and the copper grain
boundaries. When these boundaries become wide and/or dark in appearance,
sensitivity is lost for detecting separation and cracks.
Lastly, the primary reason that the sodium dicromate etchant popularity
declined is the the chrome content and EPA rulings on chrome. The issue
over chrome was a key reason that the etchant was dropped from the test
methods and military use.
Happy microsectioning,
Randy Reed
Merix Corporation
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|