TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From [log in to unmask] Wed Sep 18 08:
55:04 1996
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:07:47 +0800
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/6285
X-Sender:
[log in to unmask] (Unverified)
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"9YBXj2.0.jCD.NjpFo"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Poh Kong Hui <[log in to unmask]>
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0v3A2y-00005BC; Tue, 17 Sep 96 18:59 CDT
Cc:
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (16)
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
Hi Ed,

As I realise you have thru' hole component before epoxy application. As 
for our process, we insert the thru' hole after the SMT process. That's the
difference between your process and ours.
I am not too sure about the print life. However, I have been printing since ]
year 92.. 

The reason why I started off with this method is due to insufficient output 
from dispensing machine. I have to feed 2 SMT lines for the same models.
The volume during is pretty high.. I have problem at the beginning with the
epoxy thickness. The SOIC package has a pretty high stand-off. Later,
I have mounted 4 pieces of  small 5 mil thick plate at bottom corners of the
stencil. I work OK but inconsistent. Later, I re-design the stencil using the 
plate thickness of 12 mil, play around with print speed and squeegee 
pressure.  It works well. 

I only using Camalot for pilot run or Screen printer down for maintenance.

We presently run a model, about 300 points at the solder side, that
require epoxy to hold the component, Epoxy used is Loctite 3607 and 
the line has continue running this product for 6 days without changing 
the epoxy.  So far the printing quality is pretty OK. 
I have try Loctite 3612, it works pretty well too. Except for the smell.

To remove the epoxy or clean the stencil that with epoxy, I guess you 
have to check with Loctite. They have a good epoxy remover. So far I 
have evaluated it, but have not use it, I still have some old ex-stoxk chemical
that blend by one of our local companies.

I am not sure that I have answered correctly. Please do Email me if you need
any info' that I able to provide.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
At , you wrote:
>Poh Kong Hui
>
>You stated that you are stencil printing your smd adhesive.  I am aware of 
>the process and read about it.  We presently build mixed technology boards 
>so this process is not necessary for us, we dispense adhesive because the 
>thru-hole parts are already in the PCB.  I would like to know why you chose 
>this process, how you are using it in production and the problems and 
>successes that you have with the process, especially in the print life and 
>cleaning.
>
>Anyone else is welcome to answer also.
>
>Thanks
>
>Ed Holton
>[log in to unmask]
Poh Kong Hui 
Nera Electronics
Fax: (65) 7765492

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2