TECHNET Archives

February 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"D.Terstegge" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:10:10 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2997 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Hi Earl,

About CBGA's, I just uploaded a very interesting document called "Ceramic Ball Grid Array Assembly Reliability in Military  Applications" to www.smtinfo.net/docs/bga_80775_c.pdf  It's about the assembly process with Kyocera's dimpled CBGA, with SnPbBi solderballs (melting point close to eutectic solder). Really good stuff, including results of reliability studies.

Best regards,

Daan

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Earl Moon 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:41 PM
  Subject: [TN] Ceramic CSP's and BGA's in general


  Kind folks of the IPC TechNet and those not so but well informed concering
  the subject issue - for me.

  I have gone back and re-read all the articles and papers concerning ceramic
  packages, but for CCGA's. I am, as some of you in the past, about the great
  CTE mismatch between ceramic, silicon, and MLB's without constraining or
  tailoring core materials.

  My "frinds" at TI and IBM have been the primary players in this game. TI's
  approach to solder balls is using eutectic types - I belive though not
  certain in every instance. IBM talks to hard balls (90% lead) instead - in
  most cases as I again believe.

  I like the hard ball approach because no collapse, of course, is effected
  during reflow. Therefore, more hot air is allowed to "circulate" under and
  between the balls effecting a better solder joint consistently.

  I am hopeful, some of you can shed some light with positive experiences with
  the aformentiond parts and their solder joint acceptable initially, and long
  term reliability. Realizing we have gone down this pass a few times, I hope
  there is some "new" information besides the great stuff the two companies in
  question provide.

  As a lover of CCGA's, past and present, by IBM, I wish these parts could use
  this technology. It works first and always.

  Beyond this, I am hoping TI, as a major DSP device supplier, proves its
  plastic BGA (super BGA or perimeter BGA - whichever) does the job. It is
  said they are packaging four chips in this package style making it lower
  cost and certainly more reliable due to the CTE issue.

  Any input appreciated,

  MoonMan

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
  To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
  the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
  To temporarily halt delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL
  To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
  Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
  Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
  information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2