Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sYxxm-0000GoC; Thu, 20 Jul 95 10:56 CDT |
Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!uu.psi.com!ptsys1!pt.com!tmt> |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jul 95 11:37:13 EDT |
Precedence: |
list |
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Eo_aT.0.4_7.rod3m"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
24:51 1996 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We have a customer who requires tin/tin type sockets as opposed to tin/gold
for all their socketed components. Their reasoning is based on the corrosion
potential from the dissimilar metals. Our problem is that tin/tin sockets
are becoming increasingly more difficult to obtain, and in some cases more
expensive than their gold plated counterparts. My question is: Has anyone
have any information or done any testing on this subject. We would like to
change their thinking if possible. Any information would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Thomas Tindale
Lead Manufacturing Engineer
Performance Computer
315 Science Parkway
Rochester, New York 14620
716.256.0200 Phone
716.256.0791 Fax
e-mail [log in to unmask]
|
|
|